refers to your landmark case decided through the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:
fourteen. Within the light of the position explained higher than, it is concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be considered for no fault of his very own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency while in the length of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it correct on the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified via the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
maintaining the conviction awarded into the appellant reduce the sentence in the appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive bit of legislation that defines several criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for all those found guilty.
four. It goes without expressing that observations made hereinabove are just tentative in nature and strictly confined for the disposal of instant bail petition.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice with the loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment on the offender, guaranteeing They're held accountable for their actions.
The issue Here's that an accused may possibly say that they meant to injure the sufferer, but they did not plan to eliminate them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted due to the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there might exist conflicts between the various lessen appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
acquitted the appellants from every one of the here charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
Online access to the statewide search of adult criminal case information during the juvenile & domestic relations district courts, criminal and traffic case information in general district courts and select circuit courts. Note: Payments cannot be made using this system.
To invoke section three hundred and 302 just because death has occurred is the largest tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there to complete, i.e. secure its citizens.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Improvement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter as a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) of the Pakistan Constitution offers primary jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.